Covid-19 is a virus created in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The Chinese scientists there were conducting gain-of-function research, manipulating and splicing coronaviruses in an attempt to research new vaccines and medicines. This work was funded by NIH, the National Institutes of Health, an American government institution that funds and promotes scientific research. The funds came in the form of grants, all paid for by the American taxpayer. The Covid-19 virus was later leaked to the public, and it resulted in the deaths of some 3 million people around the world. The lockdowns imposed by governments around the world at the behest of medical NGOs destroyed economies, evaporated trillions in wealth, stunted personal and economic growth, and ground the world to a halt. This was truly a biological chernobyl.
This is no longer the realm of “conspiracy theorists”. In May 2023, the Biden administration declassified a document from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence; it was all but certain that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had created and then accidentally leaked. Bit by bit, the curtain began to fall. For those “conspiracy theorists”, it was a colossal vindication. This nasty phrase was used to describe a wide variety of people; regular social media users, doctors, experts, healthcare professionals, scientists, and even one of the inventors of the mRNA vaccine, Robert Malone. Merely mentioning any kind of disagreement with the approved government lie about Covid-19, lockdowns, and vaccines would get you barred online, mocked and deplatformed by the orthodoxy media, sacked from your job, and made a general persona-non-grata. In some countries it had even become a crime.
This is going to be a very clear and concise article on what is now understood to be the truth on Covid-19, its origins, the lockdowns, the government lies, and the fallout. Most importantly, you will be well aware of the fact that there is one man that bares the brunt of the blame, Anthony Fauci.
Where did it leak from and how?
The Wuhan Institute of Virology is Communist China’s first ever “Biosafety Level 4” (BSL4) laboratories and was opened in 2018. It was the latest laboratory to open under the Wuhan Branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Their mandate was to study and research infectious diseases, mostly those caused by viruses, in order to help understand and combat pandemics. These labs have claimed some success in this area, claiming to have played a key role in the response to the outbreaks of SARS in 2003 and Bird Flu in 2013. A vital part of this research is something called “Gain-of-Function”. This is where pathogens are deliberately enhanced in their ability to cause disease, as it can be valuable to understand how viruses evolve, thus informing treatment options and vaccination development. You might believe this to be extremely dangerous, and you’d be right; up until 2017, this kind of research was not subject to grants and funding, owing to its danger. Barack Obama would be the one to lift this moratorium, believing it to be important to understanding and creating strategies to combat pathogens that pose a threat to the public.
This gain-of-function research was funded by the American National Institutes of Health (NIH) through the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which back then was headed up by one Anthony Fauci. The NIH, alongside US universities, and private charities such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, would funnel money into communist Chinese laboratories that were conducting extremely dangerous research. Money going into communist Chinese laboratories alone was in the high tens of millions of dollars every year. If it seems like a confusing mess of acronyms and initialisms, where money sloshes around willy-nilly, you’d be right again. Although it wasn’t designed this way, the endless, inevitable, and cancer-esque growth of government institutions has resulted in what we have today; a bloated carbuncle, where it’s difficult to tell what’s going on.
The most poignant takeaway here is the simple story of the birth of Covid-19. Tonnes of American taxpayer dollars being funnelled through a variety of systems into communist labs that were inventing new viruses. It doesn’t take a super genius or a history buff to realise that this is a toxic soup of bad ingredients. It’s bizarre to think that there were people in the United States trusting communists with something as delicate as virus research. The scientists were conducting risky research on bat coronaviruses, including Covid-19s closest known progenitor, SARS-CoV-RaTG13. The declassified government documents expose that WIV researchers were reporting an unusual illness shortly before the first cases began to be reported. It’s likely that this newly created Covid-19 quietly infected one of the workers, who then likely and unknowingly took it into the public, and changed history forever.
This is why I label it the Biological Chernobyl; communists engaging in risky behaviour, doing a bad job of it, and the world suffering the consequences.
The masks didn’t work and the ventilators were killing people.
Upon the dawn of Covid-19, the governments of the world began to compete with frothed mouths for PPE. Luckily, there was a very helpful communist country in the Far East that could quickly produce a bunch of cheap PPE; China. Ironically enough, a great deal of the PPE that would be produced over the course of the pandemic came out of Hubei province, close to Ground Zero in Wuhan. Much of the products produced, of course, fell short of the standards required. Manufacturers would often fake certifications, and not always maliciously; they just didn’t understand what the certifications meant. For example, in the EU, for a mask to be considered effective, it had to be certified by an organisation like TÜV SÜD. You also had products marked ‘CE’, which is a type of European certification, being confused with the similar looking ‘CE’ logo of China Export. There were countless billions spent on PPE, and most of it was useless. Worse still, it turns out even the PPE that did do its job, was ineffective at best.
It was understood early in the pandemic that ventilators were not the answer to treating Covid, and were in fact making a patient’s prognosis worse. The National Centre for Biotechnology Information, a branch of the NIH, in 2021 produced a report that admitted this much. What had been reported directly to the press by doctors in the hospitals even as early as April 2020 had taken over a year and a half to be acknowledged by the US healthcare authorities. Masks have taken a similar thrashing post-pandemic. Not only were most masks useless, but the useful masks were overused and incorrectly used. Surgeons that typically used these masks followed a very precise hygiene routine around using them, something that no members of the public were doing. Gloves also turned out to be useless, considering they also were not subject to the same routines and sanitary environments that surgeons, doctors, and dentists would use them to protect from disease.
Bare in mind that there were many places in the Western world that forced people to use masks by threat of fine or arrest. Businesses too became checkpoints for PPE compliance; workers had become cruel bureaucrats in the face of their corporate overlords demanding compliance. People on the street too became mini-fascists, and opinions up and down every facet of society had become highly polarised on the issue. So considering that most of the PPE was garbage, and none of the additional procedures were being followed, we’re left with a giant hole in our pockets, and a colossal volume of disposable trash.
The lockdown was killing people and destroying the economy.
Sweden was mocked internationally by experts and medical NGOs for its decision to not lock down their economy. It turns out that this was likely to be the best approach, and that fewer people died and the economy never tanked. This is not just from looking at the results in Sweden, but also by looking at the damage caused by lockdowns in other Western nations, as well as their ineffectiveness generally to prevent the disease from spreading. For the most part, Swedish authorities locked off care homes, told people to stay at home if they felt unwell, and had some small social distancing measures around large gatherings. They didn’t close all of the businesses, they didn’t lock up all of the shops and bars, they didn’t send all the workers home; they never set fire to their economy. Though there are likely to be other factors involved, the fact that Sweden hadn’t experienced the kind of colossal dying that all of the worlds rental scientists were predicting should tell us a lot about trusting foreign medical NGOs.
The National Audit Office (NAO), estimates that the lockdown cost £370bn. This number accounts for all of the spending; it doesn’t account for all of the lost opportunity, and that can be a lot greater. For example, £100 paid in furlough payments represents a government spending deficit of exactly £100. This number is far off from the reality, because not only should that £100 not have been spent, but that person receiving furlough should have earned £100 from a business through a free trade market, and even paid £20 to £30 income tax on that money. That means the real difference is -£130. What’s more, the salary paid by the market came from a business that was trading with customers; the money that ended up as salary was “at work” in the economy. The difference is essentially incalculable, but it’s certainly more than the quoted loss of £370bn. Don’t forget, the NAO is a Civil Service organisation. This means that these numbers had to go through the foggy membrane of SPADs, who doctor and spin the facts before presenting it to the Ministers, who in turn doctor and spin the facts to the public. These numbers cannot be trusted, and £370bn is likely a small representation of what was really lost. Don’t forget, our failed Test & Trace app cost £37bn alone, and this is not featured in the NAOs calculations.
The economy is what keeps our country moving, but there’s one difficult to measure component of any country, and that’s the health and wellbeing of its people. We now know that the lockdowns are likely to have caused more harm than good, and that those who called for lockdowns to end weren’t quite the “conspiracy theorists” that the government told us they were. Education came to a grinding halt, and the farce that was remote schooling became the norm. A generation of children experienced the worst education we’ve ever given, and it will take decades for this damage to be undone. Healthcare providers were forced to cancel many routine and even emergency procedures, despite often the risk of not receiving treatment being greater than the risk of catching Covid-19. Social isolation also took a tremendous toll on people, driving people more apart than they’d ever been. We’re social creatures, and it’s impossible to remove us from that. Socialising is as vital to us as breathing; without a wide variety of stimuli, we literally go crazy. There was a bizarre and confusing mix of rules about bubbles and households, and many politicians flaunted them as blatantly as most people did, but most people didn’t make those rules in the first place. Britain watched in misery at footage of the Queen, all alone amongst empty pews, wearing a mask, for the funeral of the late Prince Philip. It encapsulated how a lot of people felt. Destroyed, isolated, miserable, scared.
The Coverup
Anthony Fauci is the key figure to all of this. He opened the gate for dangerous viral research, he ensured it was funded with millions of dollars of American taxpayer dollars, and perversely would become the lead authority on how to respond to the pandemic. As the dust settled, it became clear that this man was a prime suspect for the crimes of creating the foundation for a dangerous pathogen to enter the public. What would follow would be an extraordinary series of coverups and shady activity centred around one thing; absolving Fauci of any responsibility for the pandemic.
Rand Paul, US Senator for Kentucky, would lead the charge questioning Anthony Fauci on the theory that the virus had come from a lab. This led to testy, somewhat entertaining exchanges between Fauci and Paul, and heated debate over some complicated and some relatively simple issues. One part of the debate focused around Fauci changing the definition of ‘gain-of-function’ research from what it originally meant in 2017. Before our very eyes was a true Orwell-esque moment, where in order to escape culpability, definitions of words were being altered behind the scenes. Fauci’s main counter-argument was simply to call Paul an idiot, and to tell the world that Paul knew nothing. It has worked to some degree; there is yet to be a public realisation and fallout around this, despite it being as brutally blatant and obvious as it can get.
Also behind the scenes, Fauci was on the move. As stated by the US Oversight Committee, “Former NIAID Director Dr. Anthony Fauci and Former NIH Director Dr. Francis Collins were directly involved in the drafting, publication, and public promotion of Proximal Origin (natural transmission from animals to humans) - a paper to suppress the Covid-19 lab-leak hypothesis”. In his accurate portrayal of a highly guilty man, Anthony Fauci was pressuring social media, health agencies, and even the FBI, into believing that the origin of Covid-19 was a wet market in Wuhan. The lab-leak theory was even bizarrely branded “racist” by many news outlets, as if portraying a parody of an attempt to stifle debate. Social media went the extra step; merely mentioning some of these things would get you kicked off in some capacity. We’ve never before seen or experienced such a precedent before, and this mandate for secrecy and coverup expanded into evermore areas. Twitter was a serious culprit too, where you couldn’t even message a link to the story privately. Though this would turn out not to be surprising, considering what we’ve discovered after the Twitter Files by “so-called journalist” Matt Taibbi. All in all, it was quite clear that there was a massive coverup operation going on, after all, whatever the government wants to hide from you is usually the truth. Communist China, as expected, also played a part in the coverup, being opaque and unhelpful, “accidentally” deleting information, and just being the usual communist when it came to truth. They’d even bizarrely claimed that no bats or their diseases were being studied in the lab, despite even their own propaganda videos about the institute showing bats being tested on, and this being the whole purpose of the lab.
What now?
Well, we need to thank our lucky stars that the virus created in that Wuhan lab was not more dangerous; it turns out, it was the equivalent of a new flu. Dangerous to elderly people and those with comorbidities, but mostly fine for the rest of the population, and essentially harmless to kids. Could there have been diseases that cause permanent infertility or blindness? Could there have been an airborne disease with a 50% fatality rate across all people?
It’s important to note that I’m not necessarily going to question the efficacy of gain-of-function research to provide healthcare benefits to humanity, that’s going well beyond my understanding. What is well within my understanding however, is the toxic combination of naively trusting a communist country, with sloshy American taxpayer money, and extremely dangerous viral research that involves making existing viruses more dangerous on purpose. Pfizer and all of the vaccine organisations made a killing, the public lost their lives, money, opportunities, family, education, and their future. Just understand that this was most definitely a biological chernobyl; terrible, avoidable, and yet another communist fuckup that has permanently stained the planet and all mankind.
Sources:
Declassified report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, May 2023 - from the Director of National Intelligence office (USA)
Special Report: As virus advances, doctors rethink rush to ventilate - Reuters article
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Complications in Covid-19 Patients - “In conclusion, our study confirmed that barotraumas in COVID-19 patients secondary to invasive mechanical ventilation may reflect a worse prognosis, carried high morbidity and mortality and more closely related to the patient’s underlying medical condition and elder patients.” - From National Centre for Biotechnology Information (USA)
The Swedish Covid-19 Response - From National Centre for Biotechnology Information (USA)
“Unimaginable” cost of Test & Trace failed to deliver central promise of averting another lockdown - Parliament Committees report (UK)
Fauci was ‘Untruthful’ to Congress about Wuhan Lab Research, New Documents Appear to Show - from US Congress House Documentation
Suppression of the Lab Leak Hypothesis Was Not Based In Science - Oversight Committee, US House of Representatives
How the CDC became the Speech Police - Reason Article
Censorship and Suppression of Covid-19 Heterodoxy - National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information (USA)