In the quiet, idyllic countryside village of Crépol, population 500, local French people were enjoying a traditional night of festivity. The “fête de village” is an annual (or biannual) celebration of local heritage, their culture, and the families that make up their community. This warm and wonderful evening would soon be turned into a bloodbath when 2 cars filled with sadistic young North African migrants from a town nearby turned up. They surrounded the party hall, took out their knives, sliced off the security guards fingers, and began to stab the partygoers. One 16 year old local boy would be killed, and 17 others including children would be brutally wounded in the unprovoked and random attack. The attackers made it quite clear to their victims; “we are here to stab white people”.
Much like what happened in Dublin only days before, a riot would break out, where disgusted and enraged native French people would immediately launch a demonstration in Romans-sur-Isère, the town that the murder gang were believed to have come from. Although it was a much smaller riot compared to Dublin, the coverage and the reaction from French political elites was just as severe. The rioters, despite the relatively benign riot, would be labelled “extremists militias”, “extreme-right activists”, and even the classic one, “Nazis”. Only one BBC News article exists in the entire network on the entire incident, and it is this one we are reviewing today. As expected, it focuses entirely on the relatively harmless riots, and downplays the insanely brutal racist knife attack the took the life of a child and brought untold terror to a tiny peaceful little village in France.
This BBC News article is one of the most offensive cover-ups to date, and is an unforgivable downplaying on an unbelievably brutal attack. Every layer of every sentence, from the title to the subtitle, to every line of the article, is a disgusting and offensively ugly collection of lies. Calling BBC News “propaganda” is a cliché as old as time that I do try to avoid, but it is unavoidable here. The BBC News ideological supremacists are once again overplaying their hand; their political allegiances to these far-left racial beliefs are being completely exposed by an inconvenient event. It doesn’t fit what they want people to see, it doesn’t align with their racial beliefs. It simply does not compute, and the ideological supremacists are bound by their radical ideas to distort the story and lie about what happened.
Subtitle: The interior minister wants to ban small extremist groups after a boy’s stabbing triggered riots.
As mentioned, the bullshit starts immediately with the title and the subtitle. Bear in mind, this is the only article in the entire BBC News network that covers this insanely brutal attack, and this article only covers the riotous response. The coverage starts with a slur on the rioters, calling them “ultra-right”, and mentioning the call from those political elites to “tackle” them. In moral terms, the whole story is completely backwards; the riot should be a small part of the entire story, and the focus should be on the random and unprovoked knife attack. Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin wants to ban these “small extremist groups”, in reference to the rioters that killed no-one in response to the racist attack. Why does he hate the rioters so much more than the murderers? Should it be suspicious that the Interior Minister is maybe playing favourites, considering he is also of North African descent?
The 16-year-old, called Thomas, was fatally stabbed when fighting broke out at the dance in Crépol on 18 November.
Prosecutors say nine suspects have been placed under formal investigation.
This is precisely where the article begins to get plainly offensive. Even just scratching beneath the surface of this story just a little bit will quickly reveal that this was no drunken brawl or some kind of disagreement that resulted in a fight. This was a direct attack by a group of migrants, who specifically armed themselves with knives and drove to the village to knife the locals. To describe it as “fighting broke out” is ugly. The uncredited journo that wrote this could not possibly have avoided a feeling of guilt and shame when they wrote this. To lie in such an ugly fashion in defence of an far-left ideology must take a piece of your soul from you. A little boy was targeted and murdered for his race, and the uncredited journo described it as “a fight”. This was no fight. It was an armed ambush.
Try to absorb how insulting this is for BBC News to imply that Thomas was involved in some kind of mutual brawl. It’s such a profoundly offensive thing to broadcast to the family of the dead victim of a racist attack. Why is this not questioned? Why is there no scratching beneath the surface of this story? It doesn’t take more than 5 minutes of investigating even peripherally to discover that this was far from a brawl-turned-ugly mixed with a few drinks and heated feelings. For BBC News to lie to the public so brazenly shows how deep BBC News is in the ideological message. They do not care about truth, they are focused on promotion of their ideology. A true Pravda of our age.
But extreme-right activists have seized on the boy's death.
On a visit to Crépol, a village of around 500 people in the Drôme area of south-eastern France, government spokesman Olivier Véran made an appeal to people "not to answer violence with violence" and warned that society was at risk of "tipping over".
BBC News bizarrely attributes any caring for the murder of a child as “extreme-right”. Already we’ve had “extreme” and “ultra” to describe the disgusted French people, and we’re all but 3 lines into the article. In reality, the way the resulting riots and online conversation are being labelled with such terms is an attempt to silence any and all debate. It’s an attempt to equate any dissent to the supreme ideological message as a form of thought crime. In any case, the government spokesman Olivier Véran at least was able to notice that yes, society was definitely at risk of “tipping over”, but he was wrong to suggest moral equivalence between both events.
One can’t blame this government spokesman for his statements; ultimately it’s true. The response shouldn’t be of unchecked angry violence. There’s no room in Europe or in its future for violence to be the answer to civic problems. But it is naïve of his government to believe that people from cultures where this kind of brutality is just another day can integrate into civilised France. Especially when a great deal of those people from those cultures profess to hate France, the West, Christianity, and Europeans. As for society “tipping over”, is this a society worth saving? What was the desperate need for France to have millions of North African migrants in its country? What was the profoundly logical and reasonable argument that demanded the country MUST import them? Let this society tip over with peaceful and profound political unification behind aligning the French country with the needs of French people.
Prosecutors say the circumstances surrounding the teenager's killing are unclear and have advised against jumping to hasty conclusions.
Reports say an argument inside Crépol village hall led to a brawl outside as more young people arrived at the scene in one or two cars.
Thomas, a keen rugby player, was mourned by 2,000 people and a minute's silence was held at the weekend at French rugby games.
The circumstances around the migrant knife attack is very clear. The public prosecutor himself announced that nine different witnesses reported hearing the murder gang saying they were here specifically to murder native French people (AKA “white” people), before beginning the attack. It wasn’t a brawl. It was a racist attack on the very people who had let them into their country and provided them with so much in welfare and social housing. The line about “an argument” leading to a “brawl” is referring to a local security guard having his fingers cut off by a truly sick person, before they entered the hall to knife the kids.
France’s solidarity with Thomas, the young French boy stabbed to death is sadly beautiful. The sheer quantity of people that turned up to Thomas’ funeral, with 4x the number of people from his home village attending, and French rugby games being paused to show solidarity, all should show you how French people feel, and that they’re fully aware that this wasn’t simply a tragic death at a brawl. I would also commend them, that this is most definitely the kind of solidarity that needs to be shown. The capacity for peaceful resistance against the crimes brought about by ideological supremacists onto ordinary French people is as deep as their compassion for a little boy they didn’t know, but whose heritage they shared.
Far-right politicians alleged a racial motive to the crime which has not been confirmed. But last weekend extremist groups took to the streets in Romans-sur-Isère, 16km (10 miles) south of Crépol, where they claimed some of the suspects lived.
Authorities said the protesters had come to commit violence against local residents and police officers.
Six young men have already been sentenced in connection with the riots, with fast-track jail terms of between six and 10 months.
A brief and fleeting moment in this article flirts with the truth, but it is flanked by news about the riot and an accusation that the messengers of this truth are thought-criminals. Yes, this was a racist attack. One is led to wonder, how regularly is any hint of racism blown up on the news if it is from the natives of Europe? How often do we see words and speech that could be portrayed as racist only by the far-left become headline news for weeks? Yet here, in broad daylight on the internet, the highly likely fact that this was a racist attack (with the attackers saying so too) is brushed aside like it never mattered. This is what I mean by “overplaying their hand”. It’s TOO obvious. The kicker? The rioters have been arrested and charged, already receiving jail sentences. None of the racist migrant knifemen have been charged yet. It’s a topsy turvy world.
Yet, of course, immediately after the brief mention of the ugly motivation behind the mass knife attack, we are right into the bulk of the article; the resulting riots. What’s more, there’s little evidence to actually suggest these are organised (or even disorganised) “extremist groups”. There were no political affiliations on display, no stated groups or factions mentioned that may suggest that this actually was a political organisation. The likelihood is that these were enraged local fathers, husbands, and sons, from Crépol and other neighbouring settlements. Could you contain yourself in this situation? Could the men in your life, the men you know and have known, ever stand for such a brutal, unprovoked racist attack on their own family and community? These are small towns, and people know each other; those rioters knew exactly who the killers were, and exactly where they lived. They were aware of the deep rooted racist feelings that the migrants regularly display for the natives, and they knew that this could happen.
Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin said on Tuesday that he would propose a ban on three small ultra-right groups linked to the violence.
He added that extremist militias "seek to attack Arabs, people with different skin colours, speak of their nostalgia for the Third Reich". Thirteen far-right terror plots had been foiled by authorities since 2017, he said.
Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne said politicians using the murder to "play on fears" showed a lack of respect for the victim.
It’s interesting to see how quickly some political movements have been banned, yet these drug-dealer controlled Arab no-go zones have operated freely for a decade, and continue to do so. This very year, a previously convicted child migrant called Nahel was shot dead during a police stop, triggering looting and riots across the country from migrants. Those that draw the false moral equivalence might want to pay close attention to the causes of each riot; one was the unprovoked and random murder of a child in a village, and the other was the highly provoked police response to a violent criminal in a stolen car. Where was the condemnation? Where was the crackdown on barbaric gang groups that run entire portions of French towns? Why were no deportations carried out?
Interior Minister Darmanin has recognised that a “small civil war” is on the brink, with two mass countrywide riots from both migrants and natives, primarily protesting each other. Have no doubt; the ideological elites in charge of France have sleep walked straight into this.
What’s kept off of BBC News is the now very regular migrant attacks that keep on occurring. Simply typing “France attack” in Google and looking through the news archive will list out new attacks every few days. Very recent headlines include; “France is deploying 7,000 troops after a deadly school stabbing by a suspected Islamic radical”, “Jewish woman stabbed on doorstep in France and swastika sprayed on door”, “French authorities link a school stabbing that killed a teacher to Islamic extremism”. It’s been going on for a while now, and the elite are losing control of the people. The French people will not be willing to tolerate all of this random and brutal murder, and it doesn’t matter what political terminologies or thought-crime accusations are levelled against them. Europe is undergoing a change, driven by the 3rd world problems being imported into the country now affecting more and more people. It is not morally right for the French people, culture, and country to be so profoundly humiliated by the importation of vast quantities of people from highly incompatible cultures. This long list of terrorism on French soil will continue to expand until France can get a grip of migration, and work harder to integrate people that earn the privilege of living in France.
